@Green November/December 2025 | Page 2

02

@ green says...

COP30 arrived with the weight of enormous expectations. Set against a backdrop of escalating climate emergencies, widening inequality, and fracturing geopolitical trust, many hoped Belem would mark a decisive turning point for global climate action.

Instead, despite some symbolic advances, the summit fell short of delivering the concrete, transformational outcomes the world urgently needs, which is essential to foster a sense of accountability among policymakers and advocates.

At its core, COP30 suffered from a familiar paralysis: countries ' inability to bridge entrenched divides over the phase-out of fossil fuels, climate finance, and adaptation support. Brazil ' s bold move to initiate a global debate on transitioning to a fossil-free economy briefly injected a sense of ambition.

But the lack of consensus— with more than 80 countries supporting explicit phaseout language and just as many resisting it— highlighted the deep and worrying fragmentation that must be addressed to build trust and unity in climate action.

Finance, often described as the " make-orbreak " issue of climate diplomacy, also failed to meet expectations. Developing nations had hoped COP30 would deliver clarity on scaledup financing for adaptation, loss and damage, and just transitions.

Instead, the summit produced incremental adjustments rather than the robust, predictable financing architecture required to rebuild trust. For countries already grappling with intensifying floods, droughts and heatwaves, the outcome felt disconnected from lived realities.

Another disappointment was the gap between rhetoric and implementation. While COP30 endorsed decisions to strengthen multilateralism and accelerate implementation of the Paris Agreement, there was little indication that countries were prepared to align their national policies with the level of ambition science demands.

Without enforceable mechanisms or timelines, the pledges risk becoming yet another catalogue of hopes rather than a roadmap for action.

The most significant shortcoming, however, was moral: COP30 did not respond with the urgency demanded by a planet already at the brink, risking a sense of moral disappointment and the need for renewed moral resolve among stakeholders.

In the end, COP30 will be remembered not for what it achieved, but for what it failed to deliver- a decisive, unified leap toward a safer climate future. The burden now falls on COP31 and national governments to close the widening gap between ambition and action.

22

P04 | LOCAL NEWS Nuclear enters Malaysia’ s energy conversation

P05 | LOCAL NEWS Carbon tax push

P06 | FOREIGN NEWS Safeguarding Gabon’ s growth

P07 | FOREIGN NEWS GBE sets 2030 target

P08 | ASEAN SUMMIT Malaysia steps up Malaysia is championing the ASEAN Power Grid, cross-border renewable trade, and multilateral electricity exchange that align closely with its own NETR ambitions.

P09 | ASEAN SUMMIT A unified green transition ASEAN committed to accelerating regional energy integration, particularly through fast-tracking the ASEAN Power Grid, scaling renewables, and reducing fossilfuel dependence.

P10 | COP30 Landmark outcomes emerge Despite no final consensus, COP30 marked a turning point in global climate politics. More than 80 nations supported explicit language for a fossil-fuel phaseout, prompting Brazil to launch two major global roadmaps independently.

P11 | COP30 Claiming regional leadership At COP30, Malaysia pushed hard for predictable, equitable and accessible climate finance— especially adaptation funding— aligning with the summit ' s biggest financial outcome: the global pledge to triple adaptation finance.

P12 | SARAWAK Data, depth and decarbonisation PETROS is deploying advanced tools- from SQUID-TEM sensing to AI-enhanced subsurface modelling- to cut exploration uncertainty, reduce drilling activity and shrink its carbon footprint.