@Halal Sept/Oct 2019 | Page 16

16 @Halal | SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER. 2019 Science Talk BY BRO AMIN Chairman,Global Haltech CSI: Contamination Scenario Investigation When porcine DNA is found in a product previously thought to be halal , we would be in dire need of a CSI team C RIME Scene Investigation, better known as CSI is a famous and informative American serial crime drama which combines methodical inves- tigations, real-life topics and themes in criminal problem solving. While the CSI team in the series (and actu- ally in real-life) has a role that is to extrapolate the fl ow of criminal cases such as a murder case, the same role applies in solving halal dispute cases involving the halal status of a product. WHEN THERE IS DOUBT AMONG CONSUMERS CSI in halal is a concept proposed to the halal certifi cation authority to manage complaints from consumers about any given food product in the market that is otherwise halal- certifi ed. When consumers are having any type of doubt on the halal-ness of a certain product, the CSI concept has to be mobilised as a response to the worries. Only with proper scientifi c investigation will the doubts and worries of consumers can be put to rest. THE CHOCOLATE BAR DEBACLE Looking back at the havoc that was the halal dispute case of a famous chocolate bar a few years back, in which the product that had been certifi ed halal by the authority for many years was found to somehow contain porcine DNA. The result was from a lab operat- ing under the Ministry of Health, in which two variants of the chocolate bar were tested positive. Surprisingly, however, the same two prod- ucts were sent to another lab which operates under the Department of Chemistry, and the result was found to be diff erent. They didn’t detect any porcine DNA. So you see, the dispute between the two labs had not only complicate the matter at hand, it also created a negative perception by consumers about their competency and trustworthiness. Moreover, seeing as the Department of Chemistry’s lab was a lab offi - cially recognised by JAKIM (Department of Islamic Development Malaysia), the negative perception spreads to them as well. CSI COULD HAVE SOLVED IT MORE EFFICIENTLY The negative perception towards halal authorities could have been avoided if the CSI concept was put in place during the testing period. The fi ndings itself may answer the doubt on whether the positive result of por- cine DNA was really positive or was actually HALAL SAFETY: Food products can be contaminated with procine DNA through various means and at any point in the supply chain. false positive, hence leading to the solving of where the source of contamination of porcine DNA was from. This is where having a halal CSI unit investigating the case could be tremendously useful. Not only could it help verify the exis- tence of porcine DNA, it could also trace the source of the contamination. HOW COULD A PRODUCT CONTAIN PORCINE DNA? How would a CSI unit solve the dispute when a lab result shows a positive for porcine DNA? Well, one should fi rst understand that the existence of porcine DNA in a product can come in three ways. SABOTAGE A product may contain porcine-based ingre- dients through sabotage. That is to say, the product in actuality is free from any porcine- based ingredient. However, a certain confl ict with another party, perhaps, could result in the addition of porcine-based ingredients without the manufacturer’s knowledge, and therefore would be fl agged as non-halal during testing. A sabotage is an instance where a party is trying to damage the product owner’s reputation. FORMULATION Besides sabotage, the product itself could actually contain porcine-based ingredient in its formulation. If a manufacturer does not intend to have it, then it may occur because of poor control of ingredients in the sourcing process.